What this document is
This is the applicant's short July 8, 2026 reply to DEQ's request for confirmation about the Wauford Property SSWD. It concerns a separate compensatory-mitigation site, not a change to the main Chesterfield project location.
Why it matters
It provides the direct answer that DEQ asked for. In practical archive terms, this is the clearest preserved record that the applicant agreed the originally proposed Wauford SSWD should be withdrawn.
What the document says
The reply is brief and affirmative. It confirms that the applicant wanted DEQ to proceed with the administrative update implied by DEQ's question about withdrawal of the originally proposed PRM-site SSWD.
What it means in the record
This message is important because it closes the loop opened by DEQ's follow-up email. Read together with the July 2 response package, it shows that the shift away from permittee-responsible mitigation was not merely exploratory; it was being reflected in the active permit record.